Putting the Room on the Woman

image via: decobook

It is widely accepted that architecture and fashion are interrelated in numerous ways. Fashion designers such as Issae Miyaki, Comme des Garçons and Yohji Yamamoto have been inspired by architecture and created avant-garde collections, which challenged the ideas of fashion, femininity and beauty. Their “architectural” collections are masculine and minimalist as they are usually lacking any decorative elements. Their unconventionality is primarily attributed to the form and structure of the clothes.

Contrary, Mary Katrantzou’s colourful collections are fundamentally defined by her graphics, which are digitally printed onto the fabrics. She uses trompe l’oeil effects that make parts of her prints look very realistic. The way that everyday objects such as a lampshade or a typewriter are juxtaposed with abstract shapes, unveils a sense of order and a well hidden symmetry, which could be attributed to Katrantzou’s architectural academic background.

Katrantzou has been inspired by images of old issues of the Architectural Digest and the World of Interiors magazines. Her visually spectacular collections do not challenge the ideas of femininity and beauty. Katrantzou challenges content and context. She has created dresses that have prints of room interiors, imposing the context on her clothes. As Katrantzou says, she wishes “to put the room on the woman rather than the woman in the room”.

Her collections point towards what architecture should be more occupied with: provoking its content and context. Hopefully architects will be inspired by this fashion designer and challenge content and context as playfully as Katrantzou does.

image via: exshoesme

image via: exshoesme

image via: exshoesme

image via: fivefivefabulous

The Architecture of Cupcakes

image via: mikeroweworks

Ever since that Sex and the City scene aired, where Carrie and Miranda were having a cupcake outside Magnolia’s Bakery in New York, the cupcake trend has become so big that it has established a whole industry. Interestingly, cupcakes do not owe their massive popularity to the way they taste, which is exactly the same as a piece of cake. Ultimately, the cupcakes’ success is due to their architecture.

Cupcakes are the culinary equivalent of very photogenic contemporary buildings, whose design is defined solely by their flashy façades. Eye catching objects whose content is irrelevant as their purpose is solely to create an impulsive impression. A cupcake’s wrapping hides the actual cake that is its mundane looking foundation, leaving only its flamboyant frosting to be visible. What’s underneath does not matter, nor does the relationship between the top and bottom. Furthermore, the cake-frosting ratio is non proportional, making cupcakes a bit impractical to eat. Form is definitely over function.

Although a cupcake’s original context was a suburban house party for children, it is no coincidence that the cupcake craze started in New York and it developed primarily in urban areas. The frequently non-intimate scale of a metropolis contradicts that of a cupcake, whose scale indicates that it is personal and not for sharing. A cupcake is individualistic and comforting; you can have your cake and eat it too.

Moreover, the trend started to take off around the same time that the economy started to fall. Big splurges were substituted with little indulgences and the cupcake is one filled with nostalgia. Quite appropriately, the world’s first cupcake ATM was recently built in California; instead of money it directly delivers a little piece of culinary indulgence, briefly taking us back to our childhood, when everything seemed less complicated, innocent and in technicolour…

Carrie and Miranda having a cupcake outsite Magnolia’s Bakery in NY

Cupcakes for architects. Image via: TheCakingGirl

The Anatomy of a Cupcake. Image via: thesweetestoccasion
Image via: thesweetestoccasion

Constructing a Cupcake. Image via: architette

image via: archinect

Barbie Architect: A One-Year Retrospective

image via: mocoloco

About a year ago it was widely reported that Barbie decided to have yet another career change and become an architect. She has changed more than 120 professions so far but this latest one has made such a buzz that perhaps she might stick to it.

Barbie is a self promotion maverick so it is worth looking back and examine how the queen of playscale miniaturism managed to get on the cover of the Architects’ Journal just a year after she became an architect.

It all started when a professor publicly claimed that Barbie should become an architect and abandon the computer science career that she chose to pursue the year before. Not only did Barbie get the academia on her side, before she even self-published a monograph, but she also got the backing of the AIA. Surely, if Barbie was to become an architect, she could promote the profession to her 5 year old fans and architecture would become the buzzword-du-jour in playgrounds all over the world.

She debuted her career as a young architect wearing a banal dress with a skyline print, making one of her biggest sartorial mistakes. She got it so wrong that other women in architecture publicly offered their advice on how to look more like an architect. As if they were Barbie’s sorority sisters, other female architects suggested that she should get a shorter haircut and wear more black and less pink.

Around the same time, the AIA initiated a competition for other architects to design her dream house – in Malibu of course. This outside-the-pink-box move must have got her a lot of popularity points with other architects. Barbie reacted to this hype like a living legend and she avoided the spotlight for a while, in order to recoup and mastermind her comeback.

And what a comeback it was! She became a muse and by defying the laws of space and time she became the face of iconic artwork. However, her highest point so far has when the AJ put Barbie on the cover of its “Women in Practice” issue. The AJ restyled her and Barbie appeared as sophisticated as a doll can be, wearing a Zaha Hadid inspired ensemble.

Barbie’s architectural career so far only proves that architecture is indeed a self absorbed discipline; as it is usually architects that publicly discuss other architects, even when they are plastic. Unsurprisingly, the Barbie Architect was a bigger hit in the architectural circles than in school yards. Therefore, I venture to suggest that if an institution would like to encourage young girls to pursue an architectural career, perhaps it should give away Froebel Blocks instead of promoting plastic dolls.

image via: tiffany sea

image via: The AJ

image via: design observer

image via: designboom

image via: designboom

image via: designboom

image via: designboom